Are We in Love?—A magical book turns a Seoul café into a battleground for the heart
Introduction
The first time I saw So-jung clutch that oversized book like a life raft, I felt the small ache of every late-night “what if” I’ve whispered into the dark. Have you ever wanted an answer so badly you’d accept it from anywhere—a friend, a fortune cookie, a magical hardback left by a stranger? This movie invites you to that threshold between yearning and decision, where coffee steam fogs the windows and the city outside keeps moving anyway. I watched with my own heart on the counter, remembering how exhaustion can make even sweet things taste bitter and how one kind sentence can reset an entire day. If you’ve ever cared for family, stretched paychecks, or fallen for someone who hides their softness behind sarcasm, this story feels like a warm hand around yours. Watch Are We in Love? because it believes in the courage it takes to choose love without guarantees—and it lets you feel that courage growing inside you.
Overview
Title: Are We in Love? (사랑하고 있습니까)
Year: 2020
Genre: Romance, Fantasy, Drama
Main Cast: Kim So-eun, Sung Hoon, Kim So-hye, Pan Do (Lee Pan-do), Alex Chu, Jeon Mi-seon
Runtime: 107 minutes
Streaming Platform: Viki
Director: Kim Jung-kwon
Overall Story
So-jung works the morning shift at a small Seoul café, pulling shots, baking pastries that don’t always cooperate, and racing home at night to care for her mother, who is living with dementia. The café’s owner, Seung-jae, has the brisk tone of a man who believes efficiency can protect him from disappointment; he tastes her new dessert, grimaces, and tells her to remake it, the words hitting harder than he intends. Have you ever had a boss whose scolding was really a shield? That’s Seung-jae—arms crossed, eyes careful, compassion showing in sideways moments like checking whether she got home safely. One stormy evening, a stranger leaves behind a heavy book stamped with a question: Are You in Love? Inside, the pages promise answers to any heart’s query, but only if asked earnestly.
So-jung cracks the book the way you might peek at a credit card rewards catalog and imagine a vacation you can’t yet afford—half-hope, half-defense. She asks the simplest question—Will I fall in love?—and the words on the page glow with a promise of incoming confessions. The next day, something shifts in the air like a new playlist: regulars smile wider, a delivery guy stumbles over a compliment, and Seung-jae himself, the café’s resident skeptic, becomes unexpectedly attentive. He fumbles a gentle “let me walk you home,” then argues with himself for sounding too soft. The book’s prophecy is silly and thrilling, and So-jung decides to pretend she doesn’t believe, while secretly wanting it to be true.
As confessions pile up, a little parade of would-be suitors marches through the café. There’s the sweet co-worker who has always noticed her, a handsome customer who suddenly lingers, and Seung-jae, whose careful walls spring leaks whenever she laughs. The attention astonishes So-jung, but it also exhausts her—have you ever gotten exactly what you asked for and realized you weren’t ready? Meanwhile, Anna—a poised woman with history and opinions—floats into Seung-jae’s orbit, and the old triangle ache sharpens. So-jung’s mother has good days filled with familiar songs and bad days where names slip like cups from unsteady hands, and So-jung begins to wonder if the book is a blessing or a trap.
The café itself becomes a tiny theater of choice. In Korea’s dense urban rhythm, independent cafés are social sanctuaries, places where people renegotiate boundaries over americanos and honey bread, and the film gets that texture right. So-jung trains to improve her baking, which is both craft and care—every rise and crack a conversation with time. Seung-jae tries to maintain a boss’s distance but keeps betraying himself with small, protective gestures; you can feel the tug-of-war between his fear of vulnerability and his instinct to show up. The book, meanwhile, keeps answering, though not always clearly, and its certainty starts to feel like pressure.
When Seung-jae’s jealousy flashes—quick, defensive, unproud—he apologizes in the language of busy men who struggle to say “I’m scared.” So-jung, buoyed by the attention but unsettled by her own reliance on the book, tests its power: What if she asks nothing? What if she chooses instead of waits? It’s a question about agency that resonates far beyond romance, especially for anyone who’s spent years in survival mode, caring for family while shelving their own desires. The film doesn’t lecture; it hands So-jung a tray and lets us watch her steady it.
I love how the movie threads filial devotion through the romance. Caring for a parent with dementia compresses time—whole afternoons evaporate, and tiny victories feel enormous—and the story honors that reality without exploiting it. Seung-jae’s roughest words arrive when he’s most worried about So-jung burning out, and his softest arrive when he realizes worry isn’t a substitute for trust. The book’s answers, once a thrill, begin to clash with the unpredictable rhythms of real life: buses run late, dough collapses, people say the right thing the wrong way. Have you ever wished for a perfect script and then remembered you prefer real laughter?
A misunderstanding erupts when an entry in the book seems to imply that Seung-jae’s feelings are just part of its spell. Anna, perhaps unintentionally, amplifies that doubt by reminding So-jung how fickle attraction can be in a city of constant options. So-jung pulls back; Seung-jae retreats into the safe posture of giving her space; the café quiets in that way a room does when two people are trying not to look at each other. The book, for the first time, offers no comfort—its page is smudged, the ink unclear, like a found horoscope soaked in rain. For So-jung, the silence becomes a mirror.
She decides to rebuild from the ground up: learning a signature dessert, structuring care for her mother with community support, even penciling in a weekly check-in that feels like online therapy for the soul. The film speaks softly about how love is logistics as much as poetry—timers and rides and late-night rice porridge—and there’s grace in watching So-jung choose sustainable tenderness over magical shortcuts. Seung-jae notices the changes before he’s told; he sees the steadier shoulders, the calmer eyes, and he begins to match her with his own growth, swapping control for presence.
Their next real conversation lands without the book’s help. Seung-jae admits he mistook protectiveness for permission, and So-jung admits she liked being adored but missed being seen. The city around them hums—subways, scooters, the aroma of sesame oil from a nearby kitchen—and the café’s lights reflect on the window like tiny constellations. They talk about future small things, the only kind that matter: lunch breaks, recipe experiments, a walk with her mother on good-weather days. The romance becomes a practice, not a spectacle.
In the final stretch, the stranger who left the book returns with a wry smile, as if to check whether the gift created dependence or courage. So-jung thanks her but doesn’t ask another question; the answers that matter now are the ones two people build eye-to-eye. The café hosts a quiet celebration with regulars and cinnamon sugar, and the city’s relentless pace feels, for a moment, aligned with their own. The ending doesn’t explode; it exhales. Have you ever realized the magic was just your bravery wearing a costume? That’s the peace this film offers.
Highlight Scenes / Unforgettable Moments
The Spit-Take at Dawn: In an early morning taste test, Seung-jae samples So-jung’s new dessert and all but spits it out, a harsh comic beat that lands like a slap. The scene matters because it establishes both their rhythms—his impatience and her resilience—and the café’s pressure-cooker reality. Watching So-jung swallow her embarrassment, I remembered every time feedback felt like fate. The moment sets the baseline from which he’ll later soften, and from which she’ll insist on being treated as a partner, not a project. It’s funny, but it hurts in the way truth-telling often does.
The First Question to the Book: So-jung opens the mysterious book and asks, “Will I fall in love?” The words promise incoming confessions, and the camera lingers on her hesitant smile—hope and skepticism wrestling like cats under a blanket. It’s a hinge moment where fantasy enters a working woman’s life, not to rescue her, but to provoke her. The scene captures the universal itch for certainty in love and work and caregiving, the same itch that makes us chase better mortgage rates or scroll “best credit card rewards” threads at 1 a.m. It’s the simplest spell, and it changes everything.
The Handwritten “Date Me” Sign: Seung-jae, so confident when giving orders, holds up a shy little sign asking So-jung to date him. The gesture is adorably low-tech in a city of blinking notifications, and it disarms both her and us. His bravado drops; he becomes a man trying, not a boss managing. The sign becomes the visual that romance fans screenshot and save, proof that tenderness can learn new handwriting. It’s the moment his care finally speaks in a language she can receive.
The Alleyway Argument That’s Really Concern: When So-jung’s exhaustion shows, Seung-jae snaps that she needs to take care of herself before taking care of her family. It’s the wrong tone with the right motive, and the movie is smart enough to let us hold both. The clash illuminates how caregiving stress bends even loving conversations, a nod to South Korea’s multigenerational realities and to anyone balancing wages and worry. I found myself thinking of how small systems—calendars, carpool friends, yes even online therapy check-ins—can steady a relationship. The fight becomes a gateway to truer support.
The Day the Book Fails: Midway through, an answer appears blurred and unhelpful, and So-jung is forced to act without guidance. The scene reframes the book less as fate and more as a mirror for desire. She chooses to improve her craft, reorganize her life, and let love meet her at a steadier pace. Watching her decline the shortcut felt quietly radical in a genre addicted to grand gestures. The magic pauses so the human can lead, and I cheered.
The Window-Reflection Finale: Their last conversation plays out against the café window at night, city lights winking like a constellation only they can read. Instead of vows shouted in the rain, we get logistics cloaked in tenderness—meals, medicine, mornings. It’s the kind of ending that respects adults who have people to care for and bills to pay. The magic book’s donor returns as a graceful epilogue, and the real spell is their mutual willingness to keep showing up. Sometimes happily ever after looks like two people locking the shop together.
Memorable Lines
“Will I fall in love?” – So-jung, asking the book what her heart is too shy to say It’s the purest question and the film’s thesis. She asks it from a place of fatigue and longing, not entitlement, and that difference matters. The line tilts the movie into fable territory while staying grounded in a worker’s life. It also foreshadows a deeper answer: love arrives when she chooses it, not when she’s chosen by others.
“Are you going to date me or what?” – Seung-jae, bravado crumbling into boyish urgency It reads like a bark, but you can hear the tremor underneath—a man unused to asking rather than telling. The moment is funny because it’s clumsy, and moving because it’s honest. Their dynamic flips for a beat as he risks rejection in public daylight. It’s the first time he lets her power set the pace.
“Don’t make me wait too much.” – Seung-jae, softer than he knows how to be That plea is where his control gives way to vulnerability. It’s also where So-jung realizes the stakes aren’t just hers anymore; someone else has rearranged his days around her answer. The line threads through later scenes as a gentle echo of patience learned the hard way. When she finally responds, it feels earned, not conjured.
“You need to take care of yourself before taking care of your family!” – Seung-jae, saying concern the clumsiest way possible The sentence lands like a scold, but it’s all fear underneath—fear of burnout, of losing her to exhaustion, of love arriving too late. It opens the conversation about invisible labor that so many caregivers shoulder, in Korea and everywhere. The apology that follows isn’t grand, but it’s specific, and that specificity becomes a love language. Couples grow when concern learns new words.
“Answers are just beginnings.” – The book’s benefactor, smiling like someone who’s seen a lot of endings Whether or not it’s printed verbatim, the sentiment captures the film’s arc when the mysterious woman reappears. It reframes certainty as a starting line, not a finish tape, nudging So-jung and Seung-jae to keep choosing each other in ordinary time. The line resonates with anyone who’s ever chased perfect plans—fitness trackers, VPN services, five-year personal finance goals—only to discover that daily grace is the real structure. It’s the movie’s quiet benediction.
Why It's Special
If you’ve ever daydreamed in a neighborhood café and wondered whether a small, almost magical twist could nudge two people toward each other, Are We in Love? gives that daydream a warm, sugar-dusted glow. Set largely in a sunlit coffee shop, this romantic fantasy follows So-jung and her prickly boss Seung-jae as a mysterious book turns the ordinary into the enchanted. For U.S. viewers, it’s easy to slip into this cozy world today: the movie is currently streaming free with ads on The Roku Channel, with additional free availability on Plex in many regions. Availability can change, but as of December 2025 those are the simplest ways to press play.
What makes the film instantly inviting is its tactile sense of place. You can almost smell the espresso and warm pastry as the camera lingers over countertops, recipe notebooks, and So-jung’s tentative culinary experiments. Director Kim Jeong-kwon leans into gentle lighting and soft color palettes, letting the café feel like a refuge where small acts—a shared cup, a hesitant smile—carry the weight of grand gestures. Have you ever felt this way, as if the right corner table might change your life?
The storybook device is simple on purpose: a battered volume that “answers” questions about love. Rather than complicating the plot with puzzle-box mechanics, the film treats the book like a mirror for longing. Each answer exposes the fear behind a character’s bravado or the tenderness behind their temper. It’s fanciful, yes, but the fantasy is always in service to the characters’ emotional honesty.
Tonally, the movie waltzes between whimsy and ache. Laughter bubbles up in the oddest moments—botched desserts, blurted confessions—yet a quiet sadness keeps the sweetness grounded. So-jung’s devotion to her ailing mother adds a layer of grown-up stakes, reminding us that love is less a thunderbolt than a daily, unglamorous practice. The result is a rom-com that lets you giggle and gulp back a lump in your throat in the same scene.
Acting choices sell that balance. Seung-jae’s cool exterior chips away not because the book “commands” it, but because Sung Hoon plays him like a man who’s tired of pretending indifference. Kim So-eun’s So-jung isn’t a klutz for cheap laughs; she’s the sort of resilient dreamer who learns to choose herself first, and then love begins to choose her.
Genre-wise, Are We in Love? is a café-set blend of fantasy, workplace romance, and healing melodrama. That mix can feel eclectic, but when it clicks, it’s like sipping a latte with a surprising floral note—unexpected at first, then oddly perfect. Even the film’s quieter passages, where the camera simply watches two people doing their best, feel like a breath you didn’t know you needed.
And there’s a meta-magic too: the movie invites you to ask your own questions. If you had a book that gently nudged you toward courage, what would you ask it? Would you risk a confession? Would you forgive yourself? By the time the end credits roll, the biggest spell might be the permission it gives you to try.
Popularity & Reception
Are We in Love? arrived in Korean theaters in late March 2020—those uncertain, masked spring days when a soft, hopeful film felt like a small act of kindness. The Korea Times noted the production’s genre juggling—fantasy, comedy, romance, and drama all in one box of sweets—while highlighting its heart-on-sleeve intent. That blend drew mixed critical notes but also an audience fondness for its gentle tone.
Before domestic release, the film pre-sold distribution rights to 14 territories across Asia, from Taiwan and Singapore to Thailand and Vietnam—an early sign that its cozy, rom-com warmth would travel well once theaters reopened and streaming took over our couches.
On the festival-and-fandom circuit, coverage from K-entertainment outlets kept the title in conversation. Press images and teasers circulated widely, buoyed by the built-in fanbases of its two leads. Global viewers—especially those who discovered the film on streaming after 2020—responded to its easy-to-love premise: “What if a book nudged your heart toward someone who scares you just a little bit because they matter?”
Critical reactions tended toward “pleasant but slight,” with some reviewers wishing the fantasy rules were sharper, while others praised the unabashed comfort of its café world. EonTalk, for instance, framed it as a featherweight, feel-good rom-com driven by So-jung’s growth and the movie’s affectionate gaze.
Its afterlife has been streaming-driven. As titles cycle through platforms, the film has remained accessible for casual discovery; U.S. audiences can find it free on The Roku Channel and, in many regions, on Plex—exactly the kind of low-friction availability that helps a modest theatrical performer become a weekend favorite.
Cast & Fun Facts
When we first meet café owner Seung-jae, Sung Hoon plays him with crisp edges—a man who armors vulnerability with gruffness. Watching that armor dent scene by scene is half the fun; his bemused, almost boyish beats (a tipsy confession, a reluctant grin) say “I’m already in too deep” long before he does. Fans who loved him in My Secret Romance will recognize that slow-bloom charm, now filtered through a slightly fairy-tale lens.
Away from the espresso machine, Sung Hoon has made a career out of balancing charisma with tenderness, and this film leans on that duality. He sells the premise not by turning Seung-jae into a different person overnight, but by letting pride erode into gratitude. It’s a small performance in the best sense—built from glances, pauses, and a softening voice.
As So-jung, Kim So-eun gives the movie its pulse. She plays resilience without martyrdom, capturing a young woman who chops vegetables, studies recipes, and still makes time to tuck a blanket under her mother’s chin. When the book’s “answers” start changing how others see her, Kim makes sure the deeper change is internal: So-jung learns to see herself as worthy, even when flour dusts her nose and a batch goes wrong.
There’s also a poignant layer to Kim So-eun’s work here. At the press screening, she grew emotional remembering scenes with the late Jeon Mi-seon, who plays her mother—especially a tender foot-washing moment that resonates long after the credits. That connection radiates on screen, lending the film its most moving passages.
Idol-turned-actor Kim So-hye steps in as Anna, a bright spark who adds a youthful fizz to the café’s rhythms. Her presence is the cinematic equivalent of a citrus garnish: quick, fresh, and just tart enough to keep the sweetness lively. She helps tilt the story toward rom-com delight without undercutting its gentler emotions.
In a second beat, Kim So-hye’s Anna also lets the film nod to modern crush culture—text threads, sudden flutters, the awkward thrill of proximity. She’s a reminder that first feelings are universal, whether you’re a barista with a crush or a patron nursing a cappuccino—and that sometimes the supporting character is the one who gets the timing exactly right.
As Byung-oh, Kim Sun-ung (often romanized as Sun Woong) brings comic rhythm to the back-of-house bustle. The character is a walking commentary track—observant, a little mischievous, and great at pricking Seung-jae’s ego when necessary. He keeps the kitchen lively and the narrative light on its feet.
In his quieter moments, Kim Sun-ung lets Byung-oh be more than comic relief. The sideways glances, the quick cover for a co-worker—those are the stitches that hold this café family together. He’s the guy you want on your shift when life, or love, gets messy.
As Ki-hyeok, Pan Do (credited as Lee Pan-do) is the dependable hand who treats the café like a second home. He’s the type who notices when a regular stops coming by, or when a colleague is having a rough day. The film doesn’t shout about it, but his steadiness keeps the story’s temperature warm.
In his second stretch, Pan Do adds an endearing “buddy energy,” the friend who nudges with a joke when nerves spike. In romances, not everyone carries the violin melody; some play the heartbeat. He’s the heartbeat.
The film’s most tender presence is Jeon Mi-seon as So-jung’s mother. She underplays with a grace that feels like real life: a lost look, a gentle smile, the muscle memory of caring for a child who is now caring for her. Scenes between mother and daughter anchor the fantasy to something truer and deeper.
Given that this was among her final screen appearances, Jeon Mi-seon’s work lands with extra resonance. Cast and crew spoke of her warmth at the press event, and the film honors that warmth by letting her character be fully human—dignified, loved, and essential to So-jung’s journey.
At the helm, director Kim Jeong-kwon (Ditto; Heartbreak Library; Snow Is on the Sea) favors sincere sentiment over slick irony, a trait that’s become a calling card across his filmography and recent TV work. You feel his hand most in the way he frames ordinary gestures as romantic acts, and in his willingness to let silence do the talking when words would only get in the way.
Conclusion / Warm Reminders
If you’re craving a film that feels like a kind friend—warm, a little magical, and quietly brave—Are We in Love? is that friend. Stream it tonight, and if the café lights make you want to plan a Seoul coffee crawl, don’t forget the practicalities like travel insurance and, if you’re on the road, a trustworthy VPN for streaming your home subscriptions securely. And when you reward yourself with latte and dessert, those dining rewards on a solid travel credit card can make your cozy movie night feel even sweeter. Most of all, ask yourself: what question about love would you dare to write in that book?
Comments
Post a Comment